Skip to main content

3 Questions for Todd Nicolet, Vice Provost for Digital and Lifelong Learning at UNC

At the most recent edX/2U University Partner Advisory Council meeting, we had the privilege of spending time with Dr. Todd Nicolet. Todd is the Vice Provost for Digital and Lifelong Learning at UNC. In our conversations, we found Todd to be both incredibly collegial and massively knowledgeable about the shifting landscape of higher education. We asked Todd if he’d be willing to chat about his role and his career, and he graciously agreed.

Q1.  What does the role of Vice Provost for Digital and Lifelong Learning entail? What is going on with online learning at UNC?

Digital and Lifelong Learning provides strategy, coordination, and service for online and flexible learning of all types across UNC-Chapel Hill, from short professional development experiences through full degree programs. Our units and service areas include credit programs, summer sessions, professional and community programs, online program services, a research hub, and a conference center. As Vice Provost, I lead the teams providing these campus-wide programs and services and represent the University as needed in online, digital, and flexible learning spaces.

At Carolina, flexible offerings make it possible for more amazing students to participate in our programs, and online approaches, from hybrid to fully online, have been the dominant approach. We see growth across credit-bearing opportunities ranging from pre-college through graduate programs, and we are excited, in particular, to be partnering even more closely with our Graduate School. We also see growth in professional programs that focus on competencies rather than credit, and like many, we are actively exploring pathways to help students build from such experiences into certificates and even degrees.

A key area of emphasis for Digital and Lifelong Learning and for online learning at Carolina is collaboration. The coordination our unit provides across campus enables greater collaboration between schools and departments. And we regularly reach out across our System schools to collaborate, support, and even offer programs together. I believe such strategic collaborations, both internal and external, will be critical for all types of institutions to navigate the many changes and pressures we are all facing.

Q2.  What was the career path that led you into your current role?  And for other academics who might want to consider an alternative path to a traditional tenure track faculty career, what advice can you share?

I started my career with the intention of being an English professor, but before finishing that PhD  program got pulled into working for a startup company that supported online offerings for higher ed institutions across the country. This was the 90s, so it looked a lot different than today, but those years were a fantastic way to learn about many different types of institutions and experience what students, faculty, and administrators needed and wanted.

My work at UNC-Chapel Hill began more than 20 years ago at the Gillings School of Global Public Health, supporting the CDC Responds webcast series and building online courses and programs. Over time, my roles on campus shifted across units and evolved to include a wide range of administrative experiences in school units, from finance and HR to research support and event management to even a library.

Although it was not always a primary part of my role, I kept being pulled back to online education, serving on institutional task forces, assessing support models, and managing the launch and implementation of an online degree. In my current role, these many different experiences and viewpoints at Carolina and elsewhere have informed our strategy and helped us work with online and flexible programming across campus.

For those considering a career in academia, I encourage you to seek opportunities, but be flexible. I could not have charted the path I followed, and if I had tried, I could not have forced the opportunities that opened the doors I went through. When you see needs and opportunities at your institution, be part of the solution, even if it’s not in your immediate area. Be a collaborator that respects the authority of other decision-makers but offers ideas and partnership.

Higher education needs leaders who understand both mission and operations, and there are many ways to develop that combined skillset and build a career. Developing strong management skills is rewarding in its own right but will also set you apart as someone who can help make things happen. Finally, be respectfully persistent. I don’t want to count the times I’ve been a second choice, alternate, or simply not selected at all. But so many of those “setbacks” enabled the next opportunity, creating a chance to make a connection for a different and better opportunity or providing the time needed before that particular door was ready to open. When I completed a PhD more than a decade ago, I considered pursuing a traditional faculty role but couldn’t imagine leaving the path I was already on. Higher education includes many fulfilling and rewarding career paths, and I encourage people think broadly about what working in higher ed might mean for them.

Q3. The big topic of conversation these days in digital learning circles is the latest Department of Education guidance on Third-Party Servicers and Bundled Services. What do you think of the guidance and how do you imagine this playing out?

Transparency, accountability, and affordability are all critical in higher education. We saw the disastrous effects of for-profit institutions that focused on getting students into a first term rather than retention in high-quality educational experiences, and ensuring nothing like that happens again is important work. We should all seek to develop and communicate a full understanding of how programs are supported.

Our online and flexible programs focus on quality educational experiences that support students through graduation and beyond. When we work with a vendor, we oversee their work with at least as much attention as we would if it were our own employee. And we will continue to maintain full control over admissions criteria and decisions, curriculum, tuition, and more. What I’m describing is not unique to us and represents best practices we share across institutions. Higher education is incredibly challenging to do well, and we need all the tools we can have to make the best choices for our students, faculty, and institutions.

The reporting requirements for third-party servicers previously had been focused on direct work related to financial aid, so the expansion to include almost all areas connected to delivering education was alarming. Longstanding successful programs and practices in study abroad, internships, clinical placements, joint programs, pre-college programs, learning technologies, and more all suddenly have new administrative burdens. Some of these successful approaches may no longer even be possible, particularly with the limitations on international companies, a remarkable restriction in an increasingly global landscape.

Looking forward, my fear is that the updated guidance would make important educational experiences no longer possible and would increase our administrative costs significantly at a time when we are looking to decrease the cost of education for students and institutions. Bundling services through revenue sharing has enabled us to start programs we otherwise could not and provide high-quality programming more efficiently—losing that tool would limit the ways we can help students achieve their goals.

My hope is the extensive feedback provided by associations and institutions will help communicate the innovations these tools have enabled and demonstrate the care we take in managing our programs and services to meet student needs. At institutions across the country, we share a mutual goal of providing the best education possible for students in authentic and affordable ways that help them achieve their educational and career goals. This discussion could begin a call to action to work together toward the best ways to serve students today and into the future.

Show on Jobs site: 
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Advice Newsletter publication dates: 
Wednesday, April 5, 2023
Diversity Newsletter publication date: 
Wednesday, April 5, 2023


Udimi - Buy Solo Ads from Inside Higher Ed https://ift.tt/wAkWced
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Author discusses book on grad school

Graduate school is a great mystery to students, and to some faculty members, says Jessica McCrory Calarco, the author of A Field Guide to Grad School: Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum (Princeton University Press). Calarco is an associate professor of sociology at Indiana University. She believes many faculty members (as well as graduate students, of course) will benefit from her book. She responded to questions via email. Q: How did you get the idea to write this book? Why did the issue speak to you? A: This book started as a tweet . Or, rather, as a series of tweets about the hidden curriculum of higher ed. Ph.D. student Kristen K. Smith had tweeted about the need to better educate undergrads about grad school opportunities, and it made me think about how opportunities in academe are often hidden from grad students, as well. Reflecting on my own experiences in grad school, I thought about the many times I'd found myself embarrassed because of what I didn't know -- the

Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money!

Blog:  Just Visiting Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money! By Isaac Kamola Trinity College Hartford, CT There are now numerous well-documented examples of wealthy right-wing and libertarian donors using that wealth to transform higher education in their own image. Between 2005 and 2019, for example, the Charles Koch Foundation has spent over  $485 million  at more than 550 universities. As demonstrated by Douglas Beets and others, many of these grants include considerable  donor influence  over what gets taught, researched, and even who gets hired. It should therefore come as no surprise that conservative megadonor, Walter Hussman Jr.,  lobbied hard  to deny the Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones a tenured professorship at the UNC journalism school that bears his name. Nor that her offer of tenure, awarded through the normal channels of faculty governance, was ultimately  revoked   by a far-

Live Updates: Latest News on COVID-19 and Higher Education

Image:  Woman Charged With Faking Positive COVID-19 Test From U of Iowa   Nov. 5, 6:14 a.m. A lawyer in Colorado has been charged with faking a positive COVID-19 test from the University of Iowa to get out of a court appearance, The Gazette reported.   Emily Elizabeth Cohen was booked Tuesday on a detainer from the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office, shortly after she tweeted that the Colorado court system “just had me arrested alleging I lied about having COVID. Tweeting from cop car.”   The Boulder Daily Camera reported that Cohen is scheduled for a 10-day trial in Boulder County in Colorado starting Dec. 6 for 11 felony counts stemming from allegations she collected fees from immigrant families before losing contact with them without producing visas or work permits.   -- Scott Jaschik Judge Permits Suit Against Montana State to Go to Trial Nov. 3, 6:18 a.m. A Montana judge has ruled that a suit against Montana State University over the shift to online education