Skip to main content

‘Homecoming’ and the Progressive Indictment of Neoliberalism

Homecoming: The Path to Prosperity in a Post-Global World by Rana Foroohar

Published in October of 2022.

Higher education is not ignored in Foroohar’s Homecoming. Thankfully (I guess), the problems of universities are diagnosed as symptoms of neoliberalism, not their cause. With all the bad press that elite education is getting, perhaps we should be grateful.

Or maybe not. It is hard to read Homecoming through higher ed eyes and feel all too optimistic about the future of our industry. If Foroohar, a business reporter for the Financial Times, is correct, then the world is rapidly moving towards an era of deglobalization.

Reading Bob Ubell’s piece in EdSurge about the potential drop in Chinese students studying in the U.S., an influx that accounts for over $15 billion per year in revenues for American colleges and universities, is a reminder of how dependent higher education is on globalism.

My favorite line from Bob’s article is, “Over the years, American colleges got high on Chinese cash, with Chinese funds often helping to stabilize rocky higher ed finances.” (Emphasis mine… couldn’t resist).

Chinese imports (in the form of imported students) may have been good for U.S. universities, but according to Foroohar, this trade has been bad for almost everyone else. The offshoring of manufacturing jobs to low-wage labor countries such as China has succeeded in delivering cheap goods for the U.S. but at the price of decimating entire communities from which the jobs departed.

In Homecoming, Foroohar argues that both economists and politicians are increasingly turning away from economic efficiency as the goal of policy and instead are starting to prioritize resiliency. In practice, this means tax, tariff, investment, and industrial policies that aim to build manufacturing capacity in the U.S. This change was reflected first in Trump’s trade war with China and more recently in legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that will result (among many other things) in tax incentives to build and buy electric vehicles assembled in the U.S.

The cameo role that universities play in Homecoming is that of both victim and mirror of neoliberal ideology. Faith in market mechanisms over government action resulted in the decline of state dollars to support public institutions and the rise of the for-profit education sector. Higher education mirrors the social inequalities that result when markets are unchecked in the concentrated wealth, status, and prestige of a few elite institutions measured against the struggles of large numbers of tuition-dependent colleges to remain financially viable.

Is Homecoming persuasive? Among my progressive academic friends and colleagues (and truthfully, that is almost everyone in my academic innovation network), there are few defenders of neoliberalism. In reading Homecoming, however, I wanted to hear more from the other side.

The way my social scientist brain works is that the most convincing hypotheses are those in which the most energy is spent on disconfirming.

There is little doubt that trade with low-wage, low labor protection, low environmental regulation, and low political freedom in countries like China hurts many U.S. workers and communities. Are there examples of where imports from China (say, of raw materials) are critical to high-paid U.S.-based manufacturing jobs? What sort of local employment depends on exports?

It might be that on balance, economic policies that rely on market mechanisms rather than targeted government investment in strategic industries and tariffs over free trade have indeed been bad for the U.S. If Homecoming had given more pages to the defenders of markets and trade, then the time spent in the book with the critics of these policies would have had more impact.

Likely, I’m being overly critical of Homecoming — a result of a deep suspicion of any argument that agrees with what I think. Progressive economics seems so appealing that it must be wrong. Give me a book that challenges rather than confirms my assumptions, and I’m a happy reader.

What are you reading?

Show on Jobs site: 
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Advice Newsletter publication dates: 
Friday, November 25, 2022
Diversity Newsletter publication date: 
Friday, November 25, 2022


Udimi - Buy Solo Ads from Inside Higher Ed https://ift.tt/1J4Exkj
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Author discusses book on grad school

Graduate school is a great mystery to students, and to some faculty members, says Jessica McCrory Calarco, the author of A Field Guide to Grad School: Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum (Princeton University Press). Calarco is an associate professor of sociology at Indiana University. She believes many faculty members (as well as graduate students, of course) will benefit from her book. She responded to questions via email. Q: How did you get the idea to write this book? Why did the issue speak to you? A: This book started as a tweet . Or, rather, as a series of tweets about the hidden curriculum of higher ed. Ph.D. student Kristen K. Smith had tweeted about the need to better educate undergrads about grad school opportunities, and it made me think about how opportunities in academe are often hidden from grad students, as well. Reflecting on my own experiences in grad school, I thought about the many times I'd found myself embarrassed because of what I didn't know -- the

Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money!

Blog:  Just Visiting Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money! By Isaac Kamola Trinity College Hartford, CT There are now numerous well-documented examples of wealthy right-wing and libertarian donors using that wealth to transform higher education in their own image. Between 2005 and 2019, for example, the Charles Koch Foundation has spent over  $485 million  at more than 550 universities. As demonstrated by Douglas Beets and others, many of these grants include considerable  donor influence  over what gets taught, researched, and even who gets hired. It should therefore come as no surprise that conservative megadonor, Walter Hussman Jr.,  lobbied hard  to deny the Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones a tenured professorship at the UNC journalism school that bears his name. Nor that her offer of tenure, awarded through the normal channels of faculty governance, was ultimately  revoked   by a far-

Live Updates: Latest News on COVID-19 and Higher Education

Image:  Woman Charged With Faking Positive COVID-19 Test From U of Iowa   Nov. 5, 6:14 a.m. A lawyer in Colorado has been charged with faking a positive COVID-19 test from the University of Iowa to get out of a court appearance, The Gazette reported.   Emily Elizabeth Cohen was booked Tuesday on a detainer from the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office, shortly after she tweeted that the Colorado court system “just had me arrested alleging I lied about having COVID. Tweeting from cop car.”   The Boulder Daily Camera reported that Cohen is scheduled for a 10-day trial in Boulder County in Colorado starting Dec. 6 for 11 felony counts stemming from allegations she collected fees from immigrant families before losing contact with them without producing visas or work permits.   -- Scott Jaschik Judge Permits Suit Against Montana State to Go to Trial Nov. 3, 6:18 a.m. A Montana judge has ruled that a suit against Montana State University over the shift to online education