Skip to main content

Public Higher Ed Has a Good Story to Tell

Blog: 

Regular readers will know that I am not often a font of optimism when it comes to the state of higher education, but I have been digging into the recently released “Varying Degrees 2022” report from the education shop at New America, and I’m seeing some heartening data.

There is far too much in the report to do it justice in a single blog post, but I want to acknowledge the breadth and depth of what’s there for examination and thank New America for both putting together an accessible overview and providing all of the underlying data for others to make use of.

There’s a lot of different ways to slice the data if you’re looking for evidence of positive or negative public sentiments towards higher education, but the once and (who knows?) future market researcher and communications strategist in me is particularly interested in a pair of questions.

Q: Overall, do you think colleges and universities are having a positive or negative effect on the way things are going in this country today?

And …

Q: Overall, do you think colleges and universities are having a positive or negative effect on the way things are going within their local communities today?

The first question on the effect on the country has been asked since 2020, with the percent positive declining from 69 percent to 55 percent over that time. Not great, but notable that better than half of people still have a more positive than negative or neutral view of higher ed.

The second question on the effect on the local community is new to this year’s survey, and I am ecstatic that it was asked, because I think this is the area where higher education institutions (particularly public ones) can do themselves a lot of good when it comes to generating positive public sentiment.

The narrative of “college” primarily as a place to earn a credential that advances the prospect of the individual has taken considerable root, but the New America report shows that even so, there’s considerable sentiment for higher education as a public good, deserving public support.

Eighty percent of respondents think that states should spend more to make college affordable. A similar percentage (78 percent) think that the federal government should spend more to make college affordable. That’s a clear recognition that public money should be a significant part of the support for people attending college.

Still, for public sentiment to improve, I think it’s important to start doing much more to emphasize the collective benefits of a robust system of affordable public higher education institutions. I’m not just talking about an educated populace, or general claims to fostering democratic values, blah blah blah, I’m talking about reminding people how awesome it is to have these institutions situated in nearly every corner of the country.

There is already significant research and resources dedicated to proving the economic benefit of institutions to their localities, regions and states. Sometimes the numbers are truly mind-blowing, but for most people, these numbers are also abstractions, blips on a radar that aren’t fully internalized.

On the other hand, the experiences and opportunities a higher education institution provides are specific and concrete, and these benefits accrue to people other than the most direct stakeholders of students, faculty and staff.

In many cases, a higher education institution may be a town’s chief employer, its cultural center, a hub of technology and innovation. I live in the Charleston, S.C., area, a city considered to be a world-class tourist destination (and it is), but it is also a city whose downtown is significantly enhanced by the presence of the College of Charleston, which brings not just economic activity (in the form of students and their spending) but also a necessary partner for civic events like the Spoleto Arts Festival, which brings performers and performances that would otherwise not be accessible in a place this size, while simultaneously providing a platform for local artists that makes their work more sustainable.

Those of us who live here and benefit from the college tend to take it for granted, but its absence would be a significant blow, and that’s to a city that has numerous other advantages. Imagine places where the higher education institution is even more central to the local ecosystem. Every institution has some version of this story that’s relevant to their community.

Now, it’s not as though colleges and universities should puff themselves up and declare, “You couldn’t get along without us!”—even if it might be true. Instead, the communication should focus on reminding citizens how often and in what ways they intersect with institutions, so those moments we take for granted become more visible.

Institutions should position themselves as partners, with localities and its residents as stakeholders as important as students, faculty and staff.

And then we can ask and track the answers to more questions such as:

  • Do you think your local college(s) and/or university(ies) are having a positive or negative effect on your region’s employment?
  • Do you think your local college(s) and/or university(ies) are having a positive or negative effect on your access to cultural or entertainment events?
  • Do you think your local college(s) and/or university(ies) are having a positive or negative effect on your access to new technology and innovations?
  • Do you think your local college(s) and/or university(ies) are having a positive or negative effect on your region’s ability to attract new residents?

That’s just off the top of my head in the time it takes me to write a blog post. The possibilities really are endless.

Higher education institutions have a good story to tell, a story that people are already experiencing, but it’s a story that may be divorced from its origin or obscured by other narratives about college in America as a private good exclusive to those who attend the institution.

People are primed to believe good things about our higher education institutions. Let’s remind them that these good things already exist.

Show on Jobs site: 
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Advice Newsletter publication dates: 
Wednesday, July 27, 2022
Diversity Newsletter publication date: 
Wednesday, July 27, 2022


Udimi - Buy Solo Ads from Inside Higher Ed https://ift.tt/4NxEr6d
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Author discusses book on grad school

Graduate school is a great mystery to students, and to some faculty members, says Jessica McCrory Calarco, the author of A Field Guide to Grad School: Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum (Princeton University Press). Calarco is an associate professor of sociology at Indiana University. She believes many faculty members (as well as graduate students, of course) will benefit from her book. She responded to questions via email. Q: How did you get the idea to write this book? Why did the issue speak to you? A: This book started as a tweet . Or, rather, as a series of tweets about the hidden curriculum of higher ed. Ph.D. student Kristen K. Smith had tweeted about the need to better educate undergrads about grad school opportunities, and it made me think about how opportunities in academe are often hidden from grad students, as well. Reflecting on my own experiences in grad school, I thought about the many times I'd found myself embarrassed because of what I didn't know -- the

Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money!

Blog:  Just Visiting Guest Blog: Where Does the Bizarre Hysteria About “Critical Race Theory” Come From?—Follow the Money! By Isaac Kamola Trinity College Hartford, CT There are now numerous well-documented examples of wealthy right-wing and libertarian donors using that wealth to transform higher education in their own image. Between 2005 and 2019, for example, the Charles Koch Foundation has spent over  $485 million  at more than 550 universities. As demonstrated by Douglas Beets and others, many of these grants include considerable  donor influence  over what gets taught, researched, and even who gets hired. It should therefore come as no surprise that conservative megadonor, Walter Hussman Jr.,  lobbied hard  to deny the Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones a tenured professorship at the UNC journalism school that bears his name. Nor that her offer of tenure, awarded through the normal channels of faculty governance, was ultimately  revoked   by a far-

Live Updates: Latest News on COVID-19 and Higher Education

Image:  Woman Charged With Faking Positive COVID-19 Test From U of Iowa   Nov. 5, 6:14 a.m. A lawyer in Colorado has been charged with faking a positive COVID-19 test from the University of Iowa to get out of a court appearance, The Gazette reported.   Emily Elizabeth Cohen was booked Tuesday on a detainer from the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office, shortly after she tweeted that the Colorado court system “just had me arrested alleging I lied about having COVID. Tweeting from cop car.”   The Boulder Daily Camera reported that Cohen is scheduled for a 10-day trial in Boulder County in Colorado starting Dec. 6 for 11 felony counts stemming from allegations she collected fees from immigrant families before losing contact with them without producing visas or work permits.   -- Scott Jaschik Judge Permits Suit Against Montana State to Go to Trial Nov. 3, 6:18 a.m. A Montana judge has ruled that a suit against Montana State University over the shift to online education