Blog: Just Visiting Substack personality Matthew Yglesias started a brief Twitter kerfuffle this past weekend when he asserted that higher education is an under-studied subject, particularly given that higher education institutions are loaded with social scientists who could do such studies. It’s a dumb thing to say. Either Yglesias hadn’t bothered to do a 30 second search or he was trolling for the angry responses he inevitably received. Such is the discourse, I guess. A later tweet implied that Yglesias was suggesting that it’s not that the research doesn’t happen, just that it isn’t useful, given how little we seem to know about important aspects of higher education. Part of the response involved Kevin Carey of New America jumping in with a qualified endorsement of Yglesias assertion, tweeting, “The extent to which universities as institutions--or individual programs, or professors--succeed at teaching is mind-bogglingly under-studied, particularly given what could be
Our Mission is to promote innovation in online & offline education through collaboration and connection to the most effective online, self paced, & offline classroom resources.